Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 19:00

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
10 Best RPGs With Near Flawless Steam User Review Scores - DualShockers
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Does the rest of the world see America as a joke now that Trump is president again?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
How much gold is there in the world? - Live Science
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Meta – yep, Facebook Meta – is now a defense contractor - theregister.com
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Apple Has a Huge Siri Problem That WWDC 2025 Probably Won’t Fix - Gizmodo
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How good is KIIT school of management at Bhubaneswar?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
Isaacman’s bold plan for NASA: Nuclear ships, seven-crew Dragons, accelerated Artemis - Ars Technica